Saturday, 24 September 2016

When we evaluate others or ourselves, we are actually inviting stress and pain

The statement seems strange for many.   

We continuously evaluate others, events etc.  It is strange but true, that our evaluation of anything external actually tells more of us. Putting it more bluntly, it tells, who we are?

This discussion is not about mundane practical evaluations such as exams, appointment interviews etc. These are mostly rule based with little subjectivity.  This discussion is looking into aspects of more broad evaluations, such as evaluating others and ourselves, with respect to life, possessions, colour, caste, events (such as political, personal) etc.

Societies operate by evaluation. Any evaluation needs a reference point. We can see that, the whole world seems to moving, because of one or other evaluations. A person is expected to be the best employee/businessman, best father/mother, best brother/sister, best son/daughter, best husband/wife etc.  Why there is need to the best?  When they will finally become the best, after which they can relax? This depends on with whom/what they are compared with (the reference)? And reference points are generally unreasonable, and also dynamically varying, in such a way that, they will be mostly unreachable.

Society wants you to be the best, so that you can be enslaved. Not for your personal growth.  It wants you to be unsatisfied, so that you can be put to work for the purpose laid by societies.  Most of us are unsatisfied, because there is fear of rejection by the society, which makes us do whatever we do.

A person, who is unsatisfied at the present, will always be unsatisfied. The reason is that: they are choosing to be unsatisfied now. Similarly, the person who chooses to be contented now will always find a reason to be contented. Generally, the choice is ours. The tendency or the mind-set generally remains the same.  Also, the person who is contented will not fear their evaluation, as it does not bother them. Also they will try their level best not to be in the business of evaluation. On the other hand, we have seen that unsatisfied persons always fear evaluation, when they are below par. But they wish to be evaluated, when they are above par. They will be mostly seen involved in the business of evaluation.

An unsatisfied person is suffering from dis-ease, while the contented person is at ease.  An unsatisfied person suffers from stress that will surface up in the form of various medical ailments. That is why, it is said that, never be in the company of ambitious people. They generally go to any extent to fulfill their ambitions. Why they are so ambitious at first place? Because they are so unsatisfied. Their ambitions lead to stress and their concentration in everything is weakened, and hence their outcome will be of lower quality.  On the other hand, a satisfied person will generally do the best in everything they do. It is simply because; they are not carried away by the outcome, while doing anything. They work with more concentration, and they generally produce best quality in almost everything they do.

Best dad, generally means, someone who had all the money of the world. Why so much money is required? So that all the wishes of family can be addressed. What are the wishes of the family? Big home, bank balance, good health, good family time etc. Big home & bank balance requires slogging for earning money. The side effect will be sacrifice of health and quality time. So it seems that the some goals defeat other goals. Balance might be the key.

If we are in the habit of evaluating others, it implicitly means we are actually evaluating ourselves also on those parameters. Unknowingly, we are sowing the seeds of stress for ourselves. So we should try to abstain from unnecessary evaluation. Life has already given everyone almost infinite reasons to be contented.  But we always find few reasons to be unsatisfied. The choice is mostly ours.


Thanks for reading. Your comments are most welcome.

9 comments:

  1. I agree with most of what you have said but am not sure why you have such a negative opinion about ambitious people. People can also be satisfied due to laziness and weakness. I think it's important to differentiate between ambition and greed.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for reading. I call everyone ambitious, who is not satisfied with the present state. I do not have opinions about anything nowdays, neither positive/negative.

    Lazy people are very unsatisfied ones, they work very hard not to work. They are infact ambitious.
    There are not good/bad ambitions. All bring stress.

    Ambition is greed, as he/she is not satisfied at present.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If you don't have a negative opinion about ambitious people, then you need to clarify what you mean by saying, "That is why, it is said that, never be in the company of ambitious people. They generally go to any extent to fulfil their ambitions." Why would you so strongly avoid something if you didn't think that thing to be negative?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for asking for clarification. It is very relevant.

    If you sense that someone is very ambitiousness or unsatisfied, and we are also little unsatisfied, there are strong chances that they will be able to convince you about their ambition. It is like 'residual flux'. If you have it, then others can easily turn you ON.

    If you are totally satisfied, then you there is no problem with the company of ambitious people. You may be unaffected by it. But we should make sure where we stand.

    The play is like that, whoever is more conviced, generally influences the other one. The final state of both of them may be geometric mean of individual states. Just Joking!!!. I also 'do not know' about the individual final states.

    ReplyDelete
  5. > It is like 'residual flux'. If you have it, then others can easily turn you ON.

    Awesome! Kya baat!! :)

    > But we should make sure where we stand.
    > The play is like that, whoever is more conviced,
    > generally influences the other one.

    Very very true! But I think avoiding ambitious people is not the solution. Staying in our own cocoon or comfort zone might weaken us further. What is perhaps more important is to seriously take up some of the many time-tested practices that make us strong from within. There is a reason why lotuses seldom bloom in fresh water!

    ReplyDelete
  6. > There is a reason why lotuses seldom bloom in fresh water!

    This one is awesome from your side!! This example had me speechless. Thanks. It had also made me to think harder.

    But there is a deeper side of the above example you quoted.
    Lotus has a property that water cannot stick to it'. This property is known as 'Ultrahydro-phobic'. Otherwise, you know, what can happen to it, whether is dirty or fresh water.

    Ramakrishna's example should be also be kept in view before any adventure, otherwise, it may have detrimental effects,
    'Difficult to save oneself from Kajal, if you are in a house of Kajal'.

    We should be 'lotus' first.

    ReplyDelete
  7. > Ramakrishna's example should be also be kept in view
    > before any adventure, otherwise, it may have detrimental effects,
    > 'Difficult to save oneself from Kajal, if you are in a house of Kajal'.
    > We should be 'lotus' first.

    Thats a very important point and raises a deep question on which even Vivekananda seems to differ from Ramakrishna! These are two different paths and I don't think its possible to reconcile them logically. There are people who choose to stay away from 'kajal', become lotuses and then freely associate with the world. But there are also those who judiciously associate with all kinds of people and use that experience to develop spiritually. I don't think one is better than the other. Its just a personal choice. I personally prefer the later and think that the former is largely meant for sannyasis. What would a householder otherwise do if his/her own spouse or children or close relatives are ambitious/greedy?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I do not consider sannyasis or householders as separate. Sannyas is a internal state. The external can be anything that does not matter.

    ReplyDelete
  9. > Sannyas is a internal state.
    > The external can be anything that does not matter.

    Its true that words usually don't have fixed meanings and a lot depends on the context, and Vivekananda also used the word 'sannyasi' for Ramakrishna, who was married. But the word 'sannyas' is usually used to depict people who have renounced both internally and externally, and that is the sense in which I was using it. There are some people who are also very particular about the external state and there are others who don't care. We need words to distinguish between them, just for the sake of conversation if not anything else.

    ReplyDelete